TAPAS.network | 14 January 2022 | Editorial Opinion | Peter Stonham

Technology brings challenges as well as benefits

Peter Stonham

IT’S AN OBVIOUS TRUTH that we live in a world being constantly reshaped by technology. And no more so than in transport.

In preparing just this edition of LTT we have addressed the issues of autonomous and remotely driven vehicles, aerial drone deliveries, smart cross-modal digital payment systems, harnessing data about the stops, stations and nodes in the public transport system, and introducing hydrogen powered buses.

It all adds up to a continuing revolution in how transport is both supplied and used. And that's without specifically considering the wider issue of the accelerating arrival of Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications to replace the human elements of transport provision that were once a massive creator of jobs – and costs – that both the commercial operators and public sector now target for 'efficiency savings'.

We've come a long way down that path already. Starting with the mechanisation of vehicles, when an engine replaced the horses and their grooms, and then when conductors and guards were dispensed with on buses and trains and the docks were stripped of myriads of manual labourers with the advent of containers. And when transport operators started using computers to schedule, then track and control the movements of their rolling stock.

Listening to the recently completed 2021 BBC Reith Lectures by Professor Stuart Russell, he drove home both the significance of the Artificial Intelligence explosion now taking place, and how many implications and consequences have been far from yet fully considered or grasped.

quotations 5

How will the economy adapt as work is increasingly done by machines?

Russell, Professor of Computer Science and founder of the Center for Human-Compatible Artificial Intelligence at the University of California, Berkeley, explored how we can retain power over machines more powerful than ourselves, and even the risk of an apocalyptic future.

He quoted the words of former Reith lecturer Professor Stephen Hawking in 2014, “Success in creating AI would be the biggest event in human history. Unfortunately, it might also be the last, unless we learn how to avoid the risks.”

In one of his lectures Russell explored one of the most sharply focussed issues of AI – the threat to jobs, and the role of work in human life. How will the economy adapt as work is increasingly done by machines? Economists’ forecasts range from rosy scenarios of human-AI teamwork, to dystopic visions in which most people are excluded from the economy altogether.

There doesn't yet seem to be much discussion in the transport community of how these kinds of issues will affect both the operation of the sector, and its role in the bigger scheme of things. And yet massive changes could be only a few years away.

It often feels like the role of technology is regarded as simply to help us do the same as now, only better. It could surely mean a great deal more than that – both for good, and ill.

Russell concluded his lectures with the call for a new way to think about AI systems and human-AI coexistence based on three principles – chief among them the idea that machines should know that they don’t know what humans’ true objectives are. Machines designed according to the new model should be, Russell suggests, deferential to humans, cautious and minimally invasive in their behaviour. And, crucially, willing to be switched off. Even back in 2001 HAL wasn't so keen on that.

Peter Stonham is the Editorial Director of TAPAS Network

This article was first published in LTT magazine, LTT837, 14 January 2022.

d1-20220114
taster
Read more articles by Peter Stonham
Most decisions have climate consequences. But can we really seek to embrace them all?
THE LAST FEW YEARS have seen much debate and legal challenge on how the impacts of transport projects, particularly highway schemes, should be properly assessed and appraised for their wider environmental consequences. A significant number of major road schemes have been delayed whilst the various stages of challenges have been pursued by environmental activists going to court.
Levelling up is a challenge for transport too
IT IS EASY to look at the idea of ‘Levelling Up’ through either cynical or simplistic eyes. ‘It’s just a slogan’ or ‘Not enough money’ are familiar comments. For transport people, it would similarly be a mistake to just look for the bit in the policy about transport, and what the objectives or possible funding are for local schemes or service provision, and to say ‘so that’s where we fit in’. But the subject is surely rather more of a challenge than that – for transport, just as it is for everyone concerned.
Innovation needs analysis – so why has DRT had so little?
IT IS EASY to look at the idea of ‘Levelling Up’ through either cynical or simplistic eyes. ‘It’s just a slogan’ or ‘Not enough money’ are familiar comments. For transport people, it would similarly be a mistake to just look for the bit in the policy about transport, and what the objectives or possible funding are for local schemes or service provision, and to say ‘so that’s where we fit in’. But the subject is surely rather more of a challenge than that – for transport, just as it is for everyone concerned.
Read more articles on TAPAS
An industrial view of a public policy puzzle
THE LONG-AWAITED report from the group led by Juergen Maier commissioned by Transport Secretary Louise Haigh when in opposition, has come as something of a disappointment to anyone hoping to see the full shape of the new Government’s transport strategy emerging, or even a comprehensive vision for the two subject areas it has specifically addressed - rail and urban transport.
All change for the trains and buses - but will it deliver?
PUBLIC UTILITY OR PRIVATE ENTERPRISE' is an issue of both very philosophical and practical dimensions After the Second World War, the 1945 Labour government took the view that the railways should be state owned and run, and nationalised them- and that was how they stayed for Fifty years, under governments of both colours, albeit with not-inconsiderable pruning under the Beeching plan of the early 1960s. That ownership model meant a considerable public body- the British Railways board- was required, not to mention a matching division of people in the controlling government Ministry.
What are suitable policy responses?
In the second of the two special TAPAS contributions, Peter White adds commentary on the economic and operational implications, including some observations from an expert round table held earlier this year on the topic