TAPAS.network | 14 January 2022 | Editorial Opinion | Peter Stonham

Technology brings challenges as well as benefits

Peter Stonham

IT’S AN OBVIOUS TRUTH that we live in a world being constantly reshaped by technology. And no more so than in transport.

In preparing just this edition of LTT we have addressed the issues of autonomous and remotely driven vehicles, aerial drone deliveries, smart cross-modal digital payment systems, harnessing data about the stops, stations and nodes in the public transport system, and introducing hydrogen powered buses.

It all adds up to a continuing revolution in how transport is both supplied and used. And that's without specifically considering the wider issue of the accelerating arrival of Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications to replace the human elements of transport provision that were once a massive creator of jobs – and costs – that both the commercial operators and public sector now target for 'efficiency savings'.

We've come a long way down that path already. Starting with the mechanisation of vehicles, when an engine replaced the horses and their grooms, and then when conductors and guards were dispensed with on buses and trains and the docks were stripped of myriads of manual labourers with the advent of containers. And when transport operators started using computers to schedule, then track and control the movements of their rolling stock.

Listening to the recently completed 2021 BBC Reith Lectures by Professor Stuart Russell, he drove home both the significance of the Artificial Intelligence explosion now taking place, and how many implications and consequences have been far from yet fully considered or grasped.

quotations 5

How will the economy adapt as work is increasingly done by machines?

Russell, Professor of Computer Science and founder of the Center for Human-Compatible Artificial Intelligence at the University of California, Berkeley, explored how we can retain power over machines more powerful than ourselves, and even the risk of an apocalyptic future.

He quoted the words of former Reith lecturer Professor Stephen Hawking in 2014, “Success in creating AI would be the biggest event in human history. Unfortunately, it might also be the last, unless we learn how to avoid the risks.”

In one of his lectures Russell explored one of the most sharply focussed issues of AI – the threat to jobs, and the role of work in human life. How will the economy adapt as work is increasingly done by machines? Economists’ forecasts range from rosy scenarios of human-AI teamwork, to dystopic visions in which most people are excluded from the economy altogether.

There doesn't yet seem to be much discussion in the transport community of how these kinds of issues will affect both the operation of the sector, and its role in the bigger scheme of things. And yet massive changes could be only a few years away.

It often feels like the role of technology is regarded as simply to help us do the same as now, only better. It could surely mean a great deal more than that – both for good, and ill.

Russell concluded his lectures with the call for a new way to think about AI systems and human-AI coexistence based on three principles – chief among them the idea that machines should know that they don’t know what humans’ true objectives are. Machines designed according to the new model should be, Russell suggests, deferential to humans, cautious and minimally invasive in their behaviour. And, crucially, willing to be switched off. Even back in 2001 HAL wasn't so keen on that.

Peter Stonham is the Editorial Director of TAPAS Network

This article was first published in LTT magazine, LTT837, 14 January 2022.

d1-20220114
taster
Read more articles by Peter Stonham
Are we smart enough to deal with the implications of AI?
STONE AGE MAN, if handed a smart phone, might be bemused, intrigued – and probably concerned – but it is unlikely he would immediately say how useful it was, and how it was going to change his life. The functionality of the device would hardly match the priorities of his era – after all, it cannot hunt, cut trees down or light a fire.
Infrastructure obsession ignores optimising condition and capacity
Governments and political leaders like talking about infrastructure — most specifically new infrastructure. This Government in particular seems to want almost to be measured in terms of the quantity of infrastructure it can get delivered during its term — housing, roads, power stations, and airports, to name some obvious examples. It says all this is in the name of increasing economic growth and improving the overall economy for working people. But those people, of course, have other concerns, many related to the way that the nation’s existing infrastructure is being looked after.
An unhappy MaaS Mess – and a relevant INTS in the New Year?
Governments and political leaders like talking about infrastructure — most specifically new infrastructure. This Government in particular seems to want almost to be measured in terms of the quantity of infrastructure it can get delivered during its term — housing, roads, power stations, and airports, to name some obvious examples. It says all this is in the name of increasing economic growth and improving the overall economy for working people. But those people, of course, have other concerns, many related to the way that the nation’s existing infrastructure is being looked after.
Read more articles on TAPAS
Location, agglomeration and transport – do the supposed component benefits still add up?
The role of transport in supporting economic development and industrial productivity has been supposed to be a critical element in planning for accessibility and connectivity, and a justification for greater investment to secure so called ‘agglomeration’ benefits. But David Metz wonders if the concept is really as significant as has been argued – and at the least needs careful new examination in the light of emergent trends in business, commercial and personal locational decision-making.
How will the Government deliver on infrastructure now? Does Reeves’ speech point way to new private finance plans?
The Chancellor Rachel Reeves has told Parliament that the new Labour Government has inherited a financial black hole, and has instructed the Transport Secretary that she must go through her Department’s capital spending plans in detail to make savings and ensure value for money. Peter Stonham looks at the challenge that poses.
Releasing the value of transport data
Tom van Vuren and Philippe Perret look at wider use of real-time transport data. The authors refer to a recent DfT report on their estimates of the potential of integrated network digital twins. We include a summary.